Democratic News Hubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Democratic
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Democratic
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Democratic News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home News

U.S. Senate moves toward repealing authority for military force against Iraq • Missouri Independent

admin by admin
March 17, 2023
in News


WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate took a broadly bipartisan vote Thursday to advance legislation that would end the 32-year-old and the 20-year-old Authorizations for Use of Military Force against Iraq.

The 68-27 vote moves the measure past the chamber’s 60-vote legislative filibuster and towards a final passage vote as soon as next week. House Republican leaders, some of whom have opposed repeal in the past, would then need to decide whether to bring the bill to the floor for a vote.

“Iraq is no longer a force for chaos. Iraq is now a force for regional stability and the U.S. is their partner of choice,” said Virginia Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, who sponsored the legislation. “Why would we want two war authorizations against a nation that has become a partner of choice?”

The United States maintains about 2,500 troops in Iraq to help the country’s government “counter ISIS and other non-state terrorist threats that threaten not only Iraq, but other nations in the region,” Kaine said.

Indiana Republican Sen. Todd Young, a primary co-sponsor of the bill, said during floor debate it’s been more than 10 years since any president cited the 2002 AUMF to justify U.S. military action. But he noted keeping the two authorizations in place could create issues.

“Leaving these authorities on the books creates an opportunity for abuse by the executive branch and bypasses Congress on the most important issue we consider as a body, which is how and when to send our men and women in uniform into harm’s way,” Young said.

Young sought to address objections to the repeal from some of his Republican colleagues, saying the AUMFs are not the appropriate way to try to address Iran. 

“I share the views of so many of my colleagues on the need to counter Iran. I really do,” Young said. “But reimagining a more than 20-year-old authorization that was passed to combat a totally different enemy is not the way to do it.”

The United States and Iran haven’t had formal diplomatic relations since 1980, partly in response to the Iranian revolution and the hostage-taking of American diplomats in the country. Tensions have continued in the decades since over numerous issues, including Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons, its human rights abuses and treatment of women.

Both of Missouri’s Senators — Republicans Josh Hawley and Eric Schmitt — supported the measure.

Does not include AUMF from 2001

The four-page bill would repeal the Authorizations for Use of Military Force or AUMFs that Congress approved in 1991 and 2002 for military action in Iraq.

The legislation doesn’t repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force that Congress approved following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That AUMF was originally used for the war in Afghanistan, though it’s since been used for military and counterterrorism operations in several other countries.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said Thursday the chamber would vote on amendments to the Iraq AUMF repeal bill. Those votes will likely take place next week, before the Senate votes to send the measure to the U.S. House.

U.S. House lawmakers voted 268-161 last Congress to approve a similar bill that would have repealed the 2002 AUMF against Iraq, but the U.S. Senate never took it up and efforts to get the language in the annual defense authorization package were unsuccessful.

The current slate of House GOP leaders — Speaker Kevin McCarthy of California, Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana, Whip Tom Emmer of Minnesota and Conference Chair Elise Stefanik of New York — all voted against approving that bill.

A bipartisan group of U.S. House lawmakers has re-introduced a bill in their chamber this Congress that matches the U.S. Senate legislation advanced Thursday.

It so far has 23 co-sponsors including, Florida Republican Byron Donalds, Oregon Democrat Val Hoyle, Michigan Democrat Daniel Kildee, Tennessee Republican Andrew Ogles, Montana Republican Matthew Rosendale and Virginia Democrat Abigail Spanberger.

“Voting on decisions of war and peace is a fundamental and constitutional responsibility for Members of Congress,” Spanberger said in a written statement announcing the bill’s release this Congress. “We must be accountable to the American people and cannot abdicate this responsibility to open-ended AUMFs that give too much power to a President and don’t require Congress to take consequential votes.”

Scalise and Emmer’s offices did not return requests for comment about whether they’d put the legislation on the House floor.

Difference from declaration of war

An Authorization for Use of Military Force is different from when Congress formally declares war, which it has done 11 times for five wars, according to the Congressional Research Service.

The House voted 250-183 in January 1991 to approve that AUMF with the Senate approving it by unanimous consent. The 2002 AUMF passed the House following a 296-133 vote in October and the Senate approved the measure on a 77-23 vote.

The White House indicated Thursday that if Congress approves the repeal of both AUMFs, President Joe Biden will sign the measure.

Repealing the Iraq AUMFs “would have no impact on current U.S. military operations and would support this Administration’s commitment to a strong and comprehensive relationship with our Iraqi partners,” the administration wrote in a Statement of Administration Policy.

“Furthermore, President Biden remains committed to working with the Congress to ensure that outdated authorizations for the use of military force are replaced with a narrow and specific framework more appropriate to protecting Americans from modern terrorist threats.”



Source link

Previous Post

Members of U.S. Senate agriculture panel spar with Vilsack over USDA spending, response

Next Post

Tiktok ‘Needs to Be Banned in United States,’ Ex-State Dept. Official Says

Next Post

Tiktok 'Needs to Be Banned in United States,' Ex-State Dept. Official Says

Recommended

EPA says three widely used pesticides driving hundreds of endangered species toward extinction • Missouri Independent

July 27, 2023

Citing staffing issues and political climate, North Idaho hospital will no longer deliver babies

March 19, 2023

Chinese Police Stations ‘Just the Tip of the Iceberg,’ Expert Says

April 19, 2023

Ex-Trump lawyer settles lawsuit for $1.7m in alleged unpaid fees | Donald Trump News

July 21, 2023

Don't miss it

Democratic

US auto workers expand strike as Biden prepares to join picket line | News

September 23, 2023
News

PBS, NPR Downplayed Judiciary Committee Grilling of Garland

September 22, 2023
News

As child poverty doubles, states launch or expand their own tax credits • Missouri Independent

September 22, 2023
News

Biden administration to create new gun violence prevention office

September 22, 2023
Democratic

Brazil’s top court rules in favour of Indigenous rights in land claim case | Indigenous Rights News

September 22, 2023
News

Pentagon Reverses Gender-Neutral Pronoun Policy for Awards

September 21, 2023
News

Rising rents leave more Kansas City tenants facing eviction • Missouri Independent

September 21, 2023
News

Conservation groups sue federal government for logging proposal near Yellowstone National Park

September 21, 2023
democratic-white

© Democratic News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • News
  • Democratic
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Democratic
  • Contact us

© 2022 Democractic News Hubb All rights reserved.